Prime Day

Como cliente Amazon Prime obtén 3 meses de Audible gratis
Diseño de la portada del título What Is Marriage?

What Is Marriage?

Man and Woman: A Defense

 Muestra

Escúchalo ahora gratis con tu suscripción a Audible

Prueba gratis durante 30 días
Después de los 30 días, 9,99 €/mes. Cancela tu siguiente plan mensual cuando quieras.
Disfruta de forma ilimitada de este título y de una colección con 90.000 más.
Escucha cuando y donde quieras, incluso sin conexión.
Sin compromiso. Cancela tu siguiente plan mensual cuando quieras.
Más información sobre la suscripción a Audible

What Is Marriage?

De: Sherif Girgis, Ryan T. Anderson
Narrado por: Claton Butcher
Prueba gratis durante 30 días

Después de los 30 días, 9,99 €/mes. Cancela cuando quieras.

Compra ahora por 43,99 €

Compra ahora por 43,99 €

Until very recently, no society had seen marriage as anything other than a conjugal partnership: a male–female union. What Is Marriage? identifies and defends the reasons for this historic consensus and shows why redefining civil marriage as something other than the conjugal union of husband and wife is a mistake. Sherif Girgis, Ryan T. Anderson, and Robert P. George offer a devastating critique of the idea that equality requires redefining marriage. They show why both sides must first answer the question of what marriage really is. They defend the principle that marriage, as a comprehensive union of mind and body ordered to family life, unites a man and a woman as husband and wife, and they document the social value of applying this principle in law. Most compellingly, they show that those who embrace same-sex civil marriage leave no firm ground—none—for not recognizing every relationship describable in polite English, including polyamorous sexual unions, and that enshrining their view would further erode the norms of marriage, and hence the common good. Finally, What Is Marriage? decisively answers common objections: that the historic view is rooted in bigotry, like laws forbidding interracial marriage; that it is callous to people’s needs; that it can’t show the harm of recognizing same-sex couplings or the point of recognizing infertile ones; and that it treats a mere “social construct” as if it were natural or an unreasoned religious view as if it were rational.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_c
No hay reseñas aún