Prime Day

Como cliente Amazon Prime obtén 3 meses de Audible gratis

Diseño de la portada del título Morse v. Frederick

Morse v. Frederick

Muestra
Ahorros de temporada
0,99 € al mes durante los primeros 3 meses
Comenzar mi suscripción
Oferta válida hasta el 28 de diciembre de 2026.
Ahorra más del 90% en tus primeros 3 meses.
Escucha todo lo que quieras de entre miles de audiolibros y Originals incluidos.
Descarga tu audiolibro y escucha offline, sin interrupciones
Se renueva automáticamente por 9,99 €/mes después de 3 meses. Cancela mensualmente. La oferta termina el 28 de diciembre de 2026.

Morse v. Frederick

De: The Supreme Court of the United States
Narrado por: uncredited
Comenzar mi suscripción

Se renueva automáticamente por 9,99 €/mes después de 3 meses. Cancela mensualmente. La oferta termina el 28 de diciembre de 2026.

Compra ahora por 5,86 €

Compra ahora por 5,86 €

Ahorros de temporada | 0,99 € al mes durante los primeros 3 meses

9,99 €/mes después. Se aplican condiciones. Cancela mensualmente.
Acerca de este título

At a school-supervised event, Joseph Frederick held up a banner with the message "Bong Hits 4 Jesus", a slang reference to marijuana smoking. Principal Deborah Morse took away the banner and suspended Frederick for 10 days. She justified her actions by citing the school's policy against the display of material that promotes the use of illegal drugs. Frederick sued under 42 U.S.C. 1983, the federal civil rights statute, alleging a violation of his First Amendment right to freedom of speech. The District Court found no constitutional violation and ruled in favor of Morse. The court held that even if there were a violation, the principal had qualified immunity from lawsuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. The Ninth Circuit cited Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, which extended First Amendment protection to student speech except where the speech would cause a disturbance. Because Frederick was punished for his message rather than for any disturbance, the Circuit Court ruled, the punishment was unconstitutional. Furthermore, the principal had no qualified immunity, because any reasonable principal would have known that Morse's actions were unlawful.

Public Domain (P)2014 Oyez, Inc
Ciencias políticas Política y gobierno
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No hay reseñas aún