Prime Day

Como cliente Amazon Prime obtén 3 meses de Audible gratis

Diseño de la portada del título Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District

Muestra
Ahorros de temporada
0,99 € al mes durante los primeros 3 meses
Comenzar mi suscripción
Oferta válida hasta el 28 de diciembre de 2026.
Ahorra más del 90% en tus primeros 3 meses.
Escucha todo lo que quieras de entre miles de audiolibros y Originals incluidos.
Descarga tu audiolibro y escucha offline, sin interrupciones
Se renueva automáticamente por 9,99 €/mes después de 3 meses. Cancela mensualmente. La oferta termina el 28 de diciembre de 2026.

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District

De: The Supreme Court of the United States
Narrado por: uncredited
Comenzar mi suscripción

Se renueva automáticamente por 9,99 €/mes después de 3 meses. Cancela mensualmente. La oferta termina el 28 de diciembre de 2026.

Compra ahora por 5,86 €

Compra ahora por 5,86 €

Ahorros de temporada | 0,99 € al mes durante los primeros 3 meses

9,99 €/mes después. Se aplican condiciones. Cancela mensualmente.
Acerca de este título

In December 1965, a group of students in Des Moines held a meeting in the home of 16-year-old Christopher Eckhardt to plan a public showing of their support for a truce in the Vietnam war. They decided to wear black armbands throughout the holiday season and to fast on December 16 and New Year’s Eve. The principals of the Des Moines school learned of the plan and met on December 14 to create a policy that stated that any student wearing an armband would be asked to remove it, with refusal to do so resulting in suspension. On December 16, Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt wore their armbands to school and were sent home. The following day, John Tinker did the same with the same result. The students did not return to school until after New Year’s Day, the planned end of the protest. Through their parents, the students sued the school district for violating the students’ right of expression and sought an injunction to prevent the school district from disciplining the students. The district court dismissed the case and held that the school district’s actions were reasonable to uphold school discipline. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the decision without opinion.

Public Domain (P)2014 Oyez, Inc
América Ciencias políticas Política y gobierno
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No hay reseñas aún