Títulos en Legislación

In 2012, Hakeem al-Araibi was a promising young player on Bahrain's national football team when he was arrested for attacking a police station during the Arab Spring, despite television footage showing him playing soccer at the time of the alleged attack. After three months of torture and wrongful imprisonment, Hakeem was released. He fled the country and made his way to Australia, where he was granted refugee status. Hakeem made a life here and was playing for the suburban Pascoe Vale Football Club, in Melbourne. He thought he was safe.

Michael Pollan investiga tres drogas de origen vegetal, el opio, la cafeína y la mescalina, para mostrar la arbitrariedad de nuestro juicio respecto a estas sustancias, profundamente condicionado por el estigma social.

Interesante recopilación de textos del literato y jurista Jesús Feijóo Domínguez, desde cartas al director hasta reflexiones al vuelo hechas durante sus primeros viajes o textos experimentales que pergeñaba mientras realizaba su labor como jurista.

The case for assisted suicide can seem so compelling. Surely it can't be wrong to help desperate people to kill themselves? Don't we have a right to take our own lives in certain circumstances? There are no trite or easy answers. John Wyatt helps us to navigate the arguments with hearts and heads engaged, and above all with our Bibles open. There are practical and compassionate alternatives to assisted suicide, and as many who have gone before us have found, the end of our lives on this earth may turn out to be a strange and wonderful opportunity for growth and internal healing.

Erhalte mit "Im Namen des Volkes" einen Blick hinter die Kulissen der Justiz: Kann ein Richter seine persönlichen Überzeugungen aus einem Verfahren heraushalten? Wie bringt man in Erfahrung, was wirklich passiert ist? Und kann es überhaupt gerechte Urteile geben? Diese Fragen besprechen Jonas Reese und Benjamin Roellenbleck, Vorsitzender Richter am Landgericht Köln, in diesem Podcast - nun schon in der zweiten Staffel. In jeder Folge geht es um ein bekanntes Urteil, das für Aufsehen, Empörung oder Erleichterung gesorgt hat und nicht nur juristische Fragen aufwirft, sondern auch ethische und politische.

Quanti sono gli errori giudiziari in Italia? Quante persone ogni anno subiscono la custodia cautelare, salvo poi rivelarsi innocenti? E qual è la spesa che lo Stato affronta per risarcirle? Quante di loro ottengono un indennizzo? Le ingiuste detenzioni macchiano come una brutta malattia la quotidianità della giustizia, gli errori sono la vergogna della vergogna e assumono proporzioni inimmaginabili. Dal 1991 al 31 dicembre 2020 i casi sono stati 29.659: in media, poco più di 988 l'anno.

Muss ich mein Kind in die Schule schicken? Kriege ich für den abgebrochenen Fingernagel Schmerzensgeld? Kann ich hiermit vor Gericht ziehen oder damit vor Gericht gezogen werden? Das Fachwissen von Anwälten wird im Freundeskreis gern angezapft. Denn: Für normale Menschen ist die Welt der Juristerei ziemlich mysteriös. Auch in Staffel 2 des Original Podcasts "Sag mal, du als Richterin" geben ein Anwalt und eine Richterin freimütig die Reiseführer für einen Neuling durch das unwegsame Reich der Paragraphen.

What explains the insistent pull of Roe v. Wade? Abortion law expert Mary Ziegler argues that the US Supreme Court decision, which decriminalized abortion in 1973 and was overturned in 2022, had a hold on us that was not simply the result of polarized abortion politics. Rather, Roe took on meanings far beyond its original purpose of protecting the privacy of the doctor-patient relationship. It forced us to confront questions about sexual violence, judicial activism and restraint, racial justice, religious liberty, the role of science in politics, and much more.

La magistratura può risalire la china soltanto e soprattutto con la cultura, prima ancora che con le leggi; ritornando a ragionare di una cultura della legalità sostanziale, della reputazione, della responsabilità. In questo lungo periodo di "detenzione forzata", a causa dell'epidemia da coronavirus, molto di quel che davamo per scontato si è dimostrato, alla prova dei fatti, quanto mai fragile e pericolante. La giustizia, con tutto il suo portato di esperienze, non ha fatto eccezione.

Perhaps no other television show captures our innate fascination with crime and criminals better than the original Forensic Files. Examining true crime cases from murders to insurance fraud, hit-and-runs to kidnappings, every case featured on the show is solved in large part with the help of forensic science like DNA evidence. In Forensic Files Now, author Rebecca Reisner shares her own gripping retellings of 40 favorite cases profiled on the show along with fascinating updates adapted from her popular blog, ForensicFilesNow.com.

An expert legal review of the US government’s response to epidemics through history—with larger conclusions about COVID-19, and reforms needed for the next plague In this narrative history of the US through major outbreaks of contagious disease, from yellow fever to the Spanish flu, from...

Producer of television’s iconic Degrassi franchise Stephen Stohn tells stories from behind the scenes and of making it in the music and television world in this star-studded, rock ’n’ roll trip through a Canadian show business explosion. Stohn, who has been at the heart of the entertainment industry for over forty years, shares a lifetime of experience and unique insights into how dreams are turned into reality.

Straight from the bowels of back street police stations, locked psychiatric wards and the criminal courts, these are the brazen tales of a bare-knuckle barrister.

Legal scholar Daniel S. Medwed argues that our justice system’s stringent procedural rules are largely to blame for the ongoing punishment of the innocent. Even when there is strong evidence of a miscarriage of justice, rigid guidelines, bias, and deference toward lower courts all too often prevent exoneration. Offering clear explanations of legal procedures alongside heart-wrenching stories of their devastating impact, Barred exposes how the system is stacked against the innocent—and makes a powerful call for change.

Seattle attorney and media legal analyst Anne Bremner takes us inside some of the biggest cases of recent times and offers her expert insights and analysis as our legal system faces unprecedented forces fighting to tip the scales of justice their way. Justice in the Age of Judgement is Bremner’s unparalleled and unflinching look at the captivating cases tried on Twitter and TV, where the burden of proof and fundamental legal tenet of “innocent until proven guilty” is under assault from the court of public opinion.

En France, on tue tous les jours, toutes les heures. Les faits divers envahissent les journaux, les séries télévisées de médecine légale prolifèrent, les histoires criminelles, réelles ou fictives, exercent sur le public une fascination sans borne. Michel Sapanet est médecin légiste. Sa vie, c'est la mort. Sur sa table en inox, avec un immense respect, il pratique son autopsie: exploration des boîtes crâniennes, inspection des chairs meurtries, ouverture des cœurs. Égorgés, poignardés, étranglés, pendus, tués par balle, toutes les victimes finissent par parler.

Americans are understandably squeamish about official racial and ethnic classifications. Nevertheless, applying for a job, mortgage, university, citizenship, government contracts, and more involves checking a box stating whether one is Black, White, Asian, Hispanic, or Native American. In an increasingly diverse society with high rates of intergroup marriage, the American system of racial classification is getting even more absurd. Classified argues that the time has come to consider abolishing official racial classification and replace it with the separation of race and state.

This audiobook features opening arguments followed by two rounds of reply between two moral philosophers on opposing sides of the abortion debate. In the opening essays, Kate Greasley and Christopher Kaczor lay out what they take to be the best case for and against abortion rights. In the ensuing dialogue, they engage with each other’s arguments, and each responds to criticisms fielded by the other. The result gives listeners a window into how moral philosophers argue about the contentious issue of abortion rights, and an in-depth analysis of the compelling arguments on both sides.

Nel biennio 2017-2018 è iniziata una nuova fase della politica, in Italia e nel mondo? Come è cominciata? Quali sono le ragioni di lungo periodo di questo cambio di registro? Si può dire che i vinti abbiano aperto la strada ai vincitori? Questi dialoghi contengono una riflessione sulle vicende politiche e istituzionali italiane, considerando il sistema politico, i suoi dati strutturali, i modi in cui opera la democrazia, i condizionamenti e i contesti europeo e globale.

The conventional wisdom about Felix Frankfurter―Harvard law professor and Supreme Court justice―is that he struggled to fill the seat once held by Oliver Wendell Holmes. Scholars have portrayed Frankfurter as a judicial failure, a liberal lawyer turned conservative justice, and the Warren Court’s principal villain. And yet none of these characterizations rings true.