Resultados de "Boris Kriger" en Todas las categorias

What is it that we do when we think? We imagine the mind as a mirror, faithfully reflecting a world that shines in through the senses. It is nothing of the kind. The mind is a fire that exists only while it burns—an activity, not a container; a verb, not a vessel.

Under the old rule of the Sanhedrin, a man convicted by every single judge walked free. Seventy-one votes for guilt, and the court released him. The reasoning was not mercy. It was quality control. If nobody on the bench could find a word to say for the accused, then nobody had been looking, and a court that has stopped looking is not a court. Unanimity was treated as a sign that the instrument had broken. Modern life produces unanimity by the hour, and we treat it as proof. This book argues that our century is not less dogmatic than the ones we condescend to, merely better dressed.

We are told that the moral life is a matter of choices, and that a good person is someone who chooses well. Iris Murdoch spent a lifetime quietly dismantling that comfortable picture. For her, the decisive moral work happens long before any choice arrives, in the invisible labor of how we look at the world. By the time we act, the seeing is already done, and the seeing is nearly everything. This book takes the luminous, demanding philosophy of one of the twentieth century’s most original minds and sets it loose in our own restless age.

For twenty-four centuries a stubborn Greek has been telling us that motion is impossible, and no one has quite managed to prove him wrong. Achilles can never catch the tortoise. The arrow in flight is, at every instant, perfectly still. To cross a room you must first cross half of it, and then half of what remains, and then half of that, without end. These are the paradoxes of Zeno of Elea, and the quietly embarrassing truth is that the standard replies to them, from Aristotle through the calculus to Cantor, defeat the arithmetic while leaving the wound untouched.

Three hundred years ago, a professor of rhetoric in Naples proposed a criterion of truth that his century could not bring itself to hear. We know for certain only what we have made. Everything else we merely observe, and observation, he warned, is a poorer kind of knowing than we like to pretend...

We are taught to think of culture as a museum: a building full of finished objects, each with a little label, each waiting quietly to be admired. Yuri Lotman spent his life arguing that this picture is precisely wrong. Culture, he insisted, is not a warehouse of things but a living process of making meaning—a vast, restless conversation in which a poem, a duel, a city street, a silence, and a wedding ring are all sentences in the same enormous language. Nothing in it is ever neutral. Nothing in it ever quite finishes. This book is an invitation into that conversation.

He is a highway in Missouri, a middle school in Illinois, a crater on the Moon, and the most famous telescope ever built. He is also the author of a sentence he never wrote. Edwin Hubble began as a small-town athlete who could not spell, promised his dying father he would study law, taught Spanish to Indiana teenagers, and coached a high school basketball team before he ever pointed a serious telescope at the sky.

Born into servitude and left lame by a master's cruelty, owning nothing that a Roman court would have recognized as property, Epictetus arrived at a conclusion the rich and the powerful could only glimpse: that the self worth keeping is not the body, not the bank account, not the name on the door, but a single faculty no one else can reach—the power to judge, to refuse, to give or withhold agreement. Everything else, he taught, is on loan and can be repossessed without notice. Once you know which is which, a tyrant has nothing left to threaten you with.

A man moves to the forest to be left alone. The forest turns out to be fully staffed. Twenty-five years ago Boris Kriger drove north out of Toronto on a nice day, kept going until he got tired, and bought a house on a hill with six and a half acres of impassable bush. He had been in Toronto three days. He was looking for silence.

Everyone who writes about Henry Miller begins by taking a side. Either he was a liberator who tore the last Victorian veil off human life, or he was a vulgar egotist who mistook his own appetites for wisdom. This book refuses both chairs at that tired table. It proposes something stranger and more useful: that Miller was never really a writer at all, and that the question of whether to admire him has been distracting us for eighty years from the one thing he was genuinely good for.

In the early nineteenth century, a philosopher with a razor-sharp mind and a disposition darker than a moonless night unleashed an idea so potent, so insidiously logical, that it has been quietly rewiring human consciousness ever since. Arthur Schopenhauer declared the world a theater of blind, insatiable Will —a cosmic force that drives everything from the growth of weeds to the ache of unrequited love —and concluded that suffering is not an accident of existence but its very essence. It was, by any measure, a terrible thing to tell people. And yet millions have found it impossible to unhear.

James Hutton made his fortune out of soot. He and a friend worked out how to cook the black residue scraped from Edinburgh's chimneys into a pale crystalline salt that dyers and metalworkers would pay for, and which had until then come by ship from Egypt. It was a good business. It left him free to spend the rest of his life doing what he actually wanted to do, which was to climb into ditches and look at rocks. Everyone agreed the world was about six thousand years old. This was not superstition. It was arithmetic, done carefully, from the only continuous historical document anyone had.

In 1965 Vera Rubin became the first woman formally permitted to observe at Palomar, a mountain whose administrators explained that her time there would have to be short because the building had no ladies' room. She cut a small skirt out of paper, taped it onto the stick figure on the men's room door, announced that the facility was now compliant, and went to work. She then spent fifteen years producing one of the most durable measurements in the history of astronomy. The measurement is simple enough to explain at a bus stop.

Somewhere in the Milky Way, if the arithmetic is kind, there may be a committee much like ours arguing about funding. Or there may be nobody at all. The remarkable thing is that we can now say, with real precision, exactly which pieces of ignorance stand between us and the answer. In 1961 a young radio astronomer needed an agenda for a three-day meeting about a subject most of his colleagues considered slightly disreputable. He broke the impossible question into seven smaller ones and wrote them on a blackboard. He was not predicting anything. He was managing a discussion.

A young man is sentenced to death for an elbow. He is not frightened, and that is the thing nobody can forgive him. His mother comes to the visiting room and makes him take off his cap. His lawyer, who has spent twenty-one years being a professional and has lately begun to think he would rather not die at his desk, finds that he cannot stop thinking about him. And somewhere above the ocean a woman who once decided everything for him is reading his trial transcript aloud to a man with a very great deal of money.

In the space of a single year, a cautious German professor who disapproved of revolutions produced two numbers that would shape the century after him. One of them was measured. The other was manufactured. Nobody, including him, ever wrote the difference down. The first was the quantum of action, squeezed out of infrared readings taken by instrument builders in a Berlin laboratory founded to help the lamp industry sell brighter lamps. It was a real quantity, extracted from real dials, and it has survived every revision physics has thrown at it since.

He got the disease right and the cure wrong, and almost nobody noticed, because the disease was so well described that the listener arrived at the prescription already grateful. Alasdair MacIntyre spent forty years arguing that our moral vocabulary is salvage—words rescued from a wreck and used with conviction by people who no longer possess the framework that made them mean anything. He then proposed a remedy: that a human life has the unity of a story, and that we become answerable by knowing which story we are in.

Every description of anything is a projection. Physics describes the world in space and time; mathematics in number; philosophy in existence and cause. Each of these is a medium, and none of them need belong to the thing described. So a simple question follows, and it turns out to have a precise...

Nine hundred years before “think for yourself” became a slogan, Pierre Abélard, known to English readers as Peter Abelard, said it out loud in a world that answered such talk with fire and the knife. He argued that we should understand in order to believe, not the reverse. He insisted that guilt lives in intention, not in the deed. He held that even saints and scriptures could be wrong, and that doubt was not a sin but a method.

For a hundred years the cosmological constant has been served up as physics' most embarrassing riddle. Empty space, we are told, has no structure at all —no grain, no direction, no preferred place to stand —and yet it presses outward on the universe, stretching the heavens apart with a quiet, relentless force. How can the same nothing be both featureless and full of push? How can emptiness shove? This book answers by refusing the trick question. The word “structureless,” it turns out, smuggles two very different ideas into one.